a5c7b9f00b Captain Kirk and his crew must deal with Mr. Spock&#39;s long-lost half-brother who hijacks the Enterprise for an obsessive search for God at the center of the galaxy. When the newly-christened starship Enterprise&#39;s shakedown cruise goes poorly, Captain Kirk and crew put her into Spacedock for repairs. But an urgent mission interrupts their Earth-bound shore leave. A renegade Vulcan named Sybok has taken three ambassadors hostage on Nimbus III, the Planet of Galactic Peace. This event also attracts the attention of a Klingon captain who wants to make a name for himself and sets out to pursue the Enterprise. Sybok&#39;s ragtag army captures the Enterprise and takes her on a journey to the center of the galaxy in search of the Supreme Being. The movie starts out on the planet of Nimbus III, where Sybok, a renegade Vulcan converts one of the locals and makes him one of his followers. How does he do it? He takes away his greatest pain. Many think this to be a stupid idea, but if you asked me, it is highly intellectual and a stroke of genius. Perhaps it is just handled the wrong way, from a directorial point of view. What I will attempt in this comment is not only to see things the way they are, but also how Shatner had originally envisioned them to be, but failed to do right, either by the lack of money or the lack of his own directorial skills. This brings me back to the point I started from. Why has the first guy we see on screen to be a drooling, speech impeded, nobody. Hell, even Abe Lincoln had a brighter future when he picked up his ticket at the box office. This guy would have done everything to get off this rock, even follow a mad man. But I think the idea itself is brilliant. How many movies do we know, where we pause for a moment and the hero tells somebody what is eating him, what his drive is, why he does what he does. By now, this has become a bit of a cliché. But Star Trek V makes it a plot point, a way to literally show us the feelings of our beloved characters. The sad thing is, it is not done very well, or at least not consequently. Although I like the Spock and McCoy scenes, we are not shown anything from the rest. Why waste screen time for the three emissaries on Nimbus III since they are nothing more than a McGuffin in the first half of the movie and almost completely disappear in the latter one. This time could have easily been used for the Enterprise crew, given them a more dignified role in the events depicted. It was a good thing of Shatner to give everyone something to do, but almost everything shown is done in a fun way and contradicts the character. We see the navigator and the helmsman get lost; the engineer bumps his head in engineering, and a lady pushing sixty performing a strip danceif she were 20. Granted, those horny hicks in the desert probably did not care, but weviewers are put out of the movie, another failure of the movie. While in Star Trek II it was made a point that Kirk is aging and the crew is aging, is this one, everybody is shown more agile than back in the original show. If we compare the appearance of Kirk in this movie and the next, he has aged almost ten years, despite the making of the two is only two years apart. Kirk is free-climbing in this and we are supposed to believe it. Then again, he falls right. Nevertheless the climbing scenes are a beautiful montage for the title credits and give the movie scale. The title creditsoriginally conceived by Shatner would have been one consecutive shot, beginning with a zoom out (following the first Sybock scene) of Nimbus three, then we go into space, travel to earth and then a zoom in on earth ending in an aerial shot of Yosemite, ala the &quot;Powers of Ten.&quot; (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUUkjWsNC9k&amp;feature=fvst) Great idea, would have been awesome, but alas, not enough money. The filmed special effects by Associates and Ferren are bad. Someone said that their limited facilities, which resulted in a lack of time, had prevented them from doing multiple passes on the starships and models, thus not giving the shots depth and credibility. The in camera effects on the other hand look very good for the most part. We have the back projected star field whenever we look out of a window and that is very convincing, also giving the director the freedom to move the camera, a luxury that a blue screen background would have prevented back then. Another plus point are the transitions we get during the flashbacks of McCoy and Spock. Also done practically and very good. The only time the back projection did not work that good are the main viewer scenes. Since the bridge is lit very brightly, the contrast on the viewer is a bit low, but nothing to complain really. The bridge is very good in this one,are most of the sets, beautifully lit and filmed. The camera-work is a highpoint of this film. One of my favorite scenes is the camera push in on the bridge, passing the actors ending on a monitor which shows us the approaching bird of prey. Someone called this an almost Hitchcockian moment, perhaps referring to the crane shot in Notorious. It is a very good moment that introduces us to the more than disappointing ending of this flick. Again, time, money and unconvincing special effects prevented this one from being what Shatner wanted it to be. I wonder if it had worked. Surely, he is not the best director, but the good stuff in his movie works very well and the major flaw is perhaps him directing himself. His whole performance screams leading man and hero, something that director Nick Meyer tried to reduce in his movies, with success. No wonder Shatner got the Razzie for acting.The dialog by David Loughery is over the top, out of character and silly. Harve Bennett euphemised it&quot;his delightful almost whimsical sense of humor&quot; in the DVD featurette The Jouurney Begins, but I don&#39;t know. I could go on and on making this movie bad, despite liking it, dreaming of how it could have been. I think they should give him the money to fix this. On the other hand, I wonder, why Shatner does not put up the money himself. Many people consider this to be the worst single piece of Star Trek ever made, but if you can just let the suspension of disbelief take hold (as with the original series) for just a few moments, you might find yourself enjoying the movie a bit more. In my opinion, the character interaction, the dialog, and yes, even the story, was *extremely* well done. The scenes with Spock and Kirk are the best scenes in all of Trek. Yes, I even think that William Shatner did an exceptional job of directing the film. The one and only complaint I have about this movie is the exterior space shots weren&#39;tgoodTrek could be, again, more like the original series. A great film for the truest of fans. On the whole, Star Trek V is a highly forgettable motion picture, regardless of whether you're looking at it from the perspective of a Trek lover or a movie-goer. While most of the Enterprise&#39;s crew are on shore leave, chief engineer Montgomery &quot;Scotty&quot; Scott (<a href="/name/nm0001150/">James Doohan</a>) and communications officer Lt Uhura (<a href="/name/nm0629667/">Nichelle Nichols</a>) stay behind to effect repairs on the new Enterprise NCC-1701A. When they learn of a terrorist uprising on Nimbus III, the planet of Galactic Peace, they are ordered by Starfleet to reassemble their crew and investigate. A renegade Vulcan named Sybok (<a href="/name/nm0524743/">Laurence Luckinbill</a>) has taken three ambassadors—Klingon General Korrd (<a href="/name/nm0177927/">Charles Cooper</a>), Romulan Caithlin Dar ()—all for the purpose of commandeering the Enterprise in order to search the center of the galaxy for the planet Sha Ka Ree, which he is certain is the home of the Creator. Unfortunately, hot on their tail is a Klingon Bird of Prey, piloted by Klingon commander Klaa (<a href="/name/nm0117245/">Todd Bryant</a>) who is trying to make a name for himself by capturing Admiral James T Kirk (<a href="/name/nm0000638/">William Shatner</a>). A year after the previous film, 2287 A.D. Realizing that the entity on Sha Ka Ree is not God but a planet-bound entity that was either created by or attracted to Sybok&#39;s arrogance, Kirk, Spock, and McCoy attempt to escape in the shuttle, but the angry entity begins to wreak havoc on the planet&#39;s surface. Kirk requests that the Enterprise, still suffering transporter problems, beam up Spock and McCoy first. JustKirk is about the be beamed aboard, the Klingon warbird attacks, demanding that Kirk be handed over to them. Spock appeals to Klingon Ambassador Korrd for help. Korrd orders the Klingon ship to destroy the entity and beam Kirk aboard. Korrd orders Klaa to apologize for his unauthorized attack on the Enterprise, and it is pointed out that their &quot;new gunner&quot; Spock is the one who fired on the entity. Kirk says that he thought he was going to die, but Spock assures him that he was never alone. Later, both the Starfleet and the Klingon crews are shown celebrating together on the Enterprise, suggesting the beginning of a Klingon/Starfleet collaboration. During the celebration, McCoy speculatesto whether God is really out there, but Kirk suggest that God is really in our hearts. Spock points out that he has lost a brother, and Kirk reminds him that he (Kirk) also lost a brother once but that he was lucky to get him back. In the final scene, Kirk, Spock and McCoy are again out camping. The three of them are finally able to sing &quot;Row, Row, Row Your Boat&quot; together. Yes. Star TrekV: The Final Frontier, a novelization of the movie by American science fiction writer J.M. Dillard (pen name for Jeanne Kalogridis), was released in 1989. So far, there are 13. Star Trek V: The Final Frontier was preceded by <a href="/title/tt0079945/">Star Trek: The Motion Picture (1979)</a> (1979), <a href="/title/tt0084726/">Star Trek: The Wrath of Khan (1982)</a> (1982), <a href="/title/tt0088170/">Star Trek III: The Search for Spock (1984)</a> (1984), and <a href="/title/tt0092007/">Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (1986)</a> (1986), and followed by <a href="/title/tt0102975/">Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country (1991)</a> (1991), all of which featured the Enterprise captained by James T Kirk. <a href="/title/tt0111280/">Star Trek: Generations (1994)</a> (1994) unites Kirk&#39;s crew with the crew of the Enterprise captained by Jean-Luc Picard (<a href="/name/nm0001772/">Patrick Stewart</a>). The other Star Trek movies featuring Picardcaptain include: <a href="/title/tt0117731/">Star Trek: First Contact (1996)</a> (1996), <a href="/title/tt0120844/">Star Trek: Insurrection (1998)</a> (1998), and <a href="/title/tt0253754/">Star Trek: Nemesis (2002)</a> (2002). <a href="/title/tt0796366/">Star Trek (2009)</a> (2009), <a href="/title/tt1408101/">Star Trek: Into Darkness (2013)</a> (2013) and <a href="/title/tt2660888/">Star Trek: Beyond (2016)</a> (2016) harken to an alternate reality in which Kirk was just beginning his career with Starfleet Academy. Matched movie hindi free downloadScavenger full movie 720p downloadEpisode 1.242 full movie in hindi downloadEpisode 1.9 movie download in mp4hindi All That Remains free downloadThe The Last WellThe Children of Darkness torrentSkripka 720p torrentJustice League Unlimited in hindi free downloadBride of Pretorius dubbed hindi movie free download torrent
kanganeneh Admin replied
326 weeks ago